"How do China and Chinese artists become legible in contemporary global circuits? In this informative study, Hentyle Yapp handles this question and its vast ideological ramifications by gauging late-capitalist art market aesthetics, academic discursive politics, and transnational multimedia dynamics. Most commendably, he asks us not to lose sight of the preemptive liberalist biases advanced by many Western accounts of non-Western cultures."
Rey Chow, author of, Entanglements, or Transmedial Thinking about Capture
"Hentyle Yapp's deconstruction of the dialectic of authoritarian regulation and artistic resistance in Chinese art is certain to attract critical attention from scholars in numerous fields. Minor China is an outstanding book that sets a new standard for analyzing non-Western art and politics otherwise."
David L. Eng, Richard L. Fisher Professor of English, University of Pennsylvania
"In Minor China, Hentyle Yapp establishes a novel framework for analyzing contemporary Chinese art with a focus on its place in the global art market since 1989."
Stephanie Kays, ARLIS/NA
"The book presents a provocative and theoretically informed study that opens meaningful conversations about a relational experience between the minor and the major. It makes a fresh and significant contribution to the fields of contemporary performance and visual culture, global Chinese studies, Asian American studies, and critical theory at large."
Ying Xiao, Journal of Asian Studies
"[Minor China] present[s] insightful theoretical and historical perspectives that engage critically with Marxist thought and post-structuralist discourse, as well as gender and queer studies, with contemporary art from greater China and its diasporas. . . and provide[s] readers and scholars of art history, critical theory, institutional critique, gender and queer studies, visual as well as Asian studies, with timely food for thought. . . ."
Franziska Koch, Art History
"The reach of Minor China goes beyond China and Sinophone studies. The book's deployment of Asian American and transnational critiques makes it a relevant title for many in the field of Asian American studies, especially those interested in the discussions of aesthetics. . . ."
Kai Hang Cheang, Journal of Asian American Studies
